Hi all,This is a quick update intended to resolve some of the contention. If pure ML-KEM draft is to be published at all (I strongly prefer not -- at least not now), I propose this draft should be published before that.
When RFC number will be assigned to draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem, I'll specify this draft as "Update" to that RFC. In the mean time, we can hopefully adopt it quickly and get to an agreement on this quickly.
Also, unlike the proposal by Bas, I believe discouraging non-PQ groups should be done separately.
Authors of ECDHE-MLKEM are very welcome as authors of this update. Welcome any thoughts and opinions. Thanks, -Usama -------- Forwarded Message --------Subject: New Version Notification for draft-usama-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-update-00.txt
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:07:15 -0800 From: [email protected]To: Muhammad Sardar <[email protected]>, Muhammad Usama Sardar <[email protected]>
A new version of Internet-Draft draft-usama-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-update-00.txt has
been successfully submitted by Muhammad Usama Sardar and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-usama-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-update Revision: 00 Title: Update to Post-quantum Hybrid ECDHE-MLKEM Key Agreement for TLSv1.3 Date: 2026-02-25 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 5URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-usama-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-update-00.txt
Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-usama-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-update/HTML: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-usama-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-update-00.html HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-usama-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-update
Abstract: This is a quick update of to-be RFC [I-D.ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem] for recommending the three hybrid key agreement mechanisms in TLS 1.3. The IETF Secretariat
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
