The Abstract begins "A format that supports the logging information about the secrets used in a TLS connection is described." I was suggesting that this should read either "A format that supports logging information about the secrets used in a TLS connection is described." or "A format that supports the logging of information about the secrets used in a TLS connection is described."
Yes, all nits, as I said. The PR looks good. ________________________________ From: Martin Thomson <m...@lowentropy.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 8:45 PM To: Mike Bishop <mbis...@evequefou.be>; The IESG <i...@ietf.org> Cc: draft-ietf-tls-keylogf...@ietf.org <draft-ietf-tls-keylogf...@ietf.org>; tls-chairs <tls-cha...@ietf.org>; tls@ietf.org <tls@ietf.org>; Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> Subject: Re: Mike Bishop's Yes on draft-ietf-tls-keylogfile-04: (with COMMENT) Thanks Mike, On Thu, Jun 5, 2025, at 05:39, Mike Bishop via Datatracker wrote: > Mike Bishop has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-tls-keylogfile-04: Yes See https://github.com/tlswg/sslkeylogfile/pull/31 I couldn't find the abstract text you quoted, but the rest saved the RFC editor some work, I suspect.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
