Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> writes: > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 10:39 AM Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> > wrote: > >> Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> writes: >> >> >> but getting RFCs published helps and some may >> >> have processes in place that would need to be changed to allow use of >> >> this if there is no RFC available. >> >> >> > >> > I agree that this is generally true, but again it would be helpful to >> hear >> > specifically from people for whom RFC publication would make a >> difference. >> >> Didn't my statement count? What kind of entity are you thinking of here? >> > > Your statement was: > >> I intend to work on both of the above for GnuTLS and would like to see >> RFCs for these. I hope people will deploy these extensions even if IETF >> block RFC publication, but getting RFCs published helps and some may >> have processes in place that would need to be changed to allow use of >> this if there is no RFC available. > > > I read this as "I intend to work on this either way, but perhaps some > people won't deploy unless there is an RFC". I'm asking to hear from > said people.
Right, that is what the context I was replying to me, and that was the meaning of my e-mail. I want to have RFCs published for things we deploy and use. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
