Hi all, I think this looks good.
Small typo: > "Of course, this places significant burden on the generation ane of external > PSKs.” ane -> and Another nit: > due to the break in the (EC)DH algorithm Is this a break of the algorithm or a break in the algorithm? Cheers, Thom > Op 13 mei 2025, om 18:42 heeft Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net> het volgende > geschreven: > > Russ has made modifications to the rfc8773bis and published a new draft [1] > to address the comments from the FATT. You can see the diffs with the > previous version are here: [2] and the FATT commentary from IETF 122 here: > [3]. > > This is a working group last call for this document. If you believe this > document has sufficiently addressed the concerns please indicate so on this > thread. If you do not think it is sufficient please indicate what text > modifications would address your issue. This call will remain open until May > 28, 2025. > > Thanks, > > Sean, Deirdre and Joe > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-8773bis/ > [2] https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-tls-8773bis-06 > [3] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/122/materials/slides-122-tls-fatt-report-rfc8773bis-00 > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
