This is my view also. This working group has a ton of active documents. Focus on the exigent threats (store and decrypt), rather than more speculative ones, might help us finish those faster.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025, at 03:38, Eric Rescorla wrote: > I do not think we should adopt this draft at this time. I would prefer > the WG focus its effort on key establishment. > Once those documents are complete, we can reconsider signature. > > -Ekr > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 10:34 AM Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: >> We are continuing with our WG adoption calls for the following I-D: >> Use of ML-DSA in TLS 1.3 [1]; see [2] for more information about this >> tranche of adoption calls. If you support adoption and are willing to review >> and contribute text, please send a message to the list. If you do not >> support adoption of this draft, please send a message to the list and >> indicate why. This call will close at 2359 UTC on 29 April 2025. >> >> Reminder: This call for adoption has nothing to do with picking the >> mandatory-to-implement cipher suites in TLS. >> >> Cheers, >> Joe and Sean >> >> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tls-westerbaan-mldsa/ >> [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/KMOTm_lE5OIAKG8_chDlRKuav7c/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
