On 15/04/2025 18:38, Eric Rescorla wrote:
I do not think we should adopt this draft at this time. I would prefer the WG focus its effort on key establishment. Once those documents are complete, we can reconsider signature.
+1 to waiting 'till at least then or later, e.g. after we have more experience with KEMs in deployment or after the PKI issues appear sorted or... Cheers, S.
-Ekr On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 10:34 AM Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote:We are continuing with our WG adoption calls for the following I-D: Use of ML-DSA in TLS 1.3 [1]; see [2] for more information about this tranche of adoption calls. If you support adoption and are willing to review and contribute text, please send a message to the list. If you do not support adoption of this draft, please send a message to the list and indicate why. This call will close at 2359 UTC on 29 April 2025. Reminder: This call for adoption has nothing to do with picking the mandatory-to-implement cipher suites in TLS. Cheers, Joe and Sean [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tls-westerbaan-mldsa/ [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/KMOTm_lE5OIAKG8_chDlRKuav7c/ _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
