The registry note "Any entry [...] makes no requirement on DTLS" does not seem correct. Consider rewording this to indicate that the *notation* does not impact DTLS, or consider adding separate explicit columns for TLS and DTLS version restrictions. Thanks for the review. That sentence is clunky and hard to understand (my fault) but I think it’s correct. The intent is that if the comment says “For TLS 1.3 or later” it only applies to TLS and says nothing about DTLS (which is spelled out in the note). We’ve managed to not have DTLS comment fields so far, and the TLS registries are about to get an update. Also we’re just starting on a DTLS 1.3bis doc to fix bugs that have been found. So I am not planning on doing anything for this.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
