Great that X25519MLKEM768 and MLKEM1024 will be in the 3.5 LTS release
https://openssl-library.org/post/2025-02-04-release-announcement-3.5/

Also great to see DTLS 1.3 as a top priority for 3.6.
https://openssl-communities.org/d/HCdTYIoN/priorities-for-3-6

John

From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-d...@dukhovni.org>
Date: Thursday, 6 March 2025 at 14:08
To: tls@ietf.org <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: [TLS] Re: ML-KEM IANA and draft-connolly-tls-mlkem-key-agreement 
codepoint and inconsistencies
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 11:29:16AM +0000, Daniel Van Geest wrote:

> IANA went with the uppercase naming, while OpenSSL went with lower.

That is not the case, OpenSSL uses the IANA names, but the matching is
now case-insensitive.  Perhaps you were testing with the oqsprovider?

    $ openssl list -tls1_3 -tls-groups | tr ':' '\n' | tail -n6
    MLKEM512
    MLKEM768
    MLKEM1024
    SecP256r1MLKEM768
    X25519MLKEM768
    SecP384r1MLKEM1024

> Lowercase is generally more consistent with the other IANA codepoints,
> with some exceptions including the recent hybrids. For what it's
> worth, the slightly different bikeshed shade that I prefer is
> lowercase.

We'll likely shortly change the group name lookup code to be
case-insensitive, just in case, and a convenience for the users.

--
    Viktor.

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to