Hi all, We recently published draft-ietf-tls-trust-anchor-ids-00: URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tls-trust-anchor-ids-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-trust-anchor-ids/ HTML: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tls-trust-anchor-ids-00.html HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tls-trust-anchor-ids
Other than the name change, it's the same as draft-beck-tls-trust-anchor-ids-03, which we discussed recently. The repository has also moved to https://github.com/tlswg/tls-trust-anchor-ids with some shuffling[1,2] since it used to be the home of a predecessor design as well. Hopefully we haven't missed anything[3]! Bangkok is soon, so we don't have a whole lot for you right now, but we've been pondering how best to iterate on the starting point here. To that end, we're thinking: - Where the document doesn't do a great job of describing the initial starting design, we'll go ahead and make editorial fixes (e.g. https://github.com/tlswg/tls-trust-anchor-ids/issues/92) as reviewed PRs and whatnot. - Beyond that, we've been collecting points of interest from the various discussions. Nothing coherent yet (been a busy week), but I've requested some time at Bangkok to try to present and go over things. In the work leading up to draft-00, we made a lot of educated guesses on tradeoffs, and I'm particularly eager to reexamine those guesses with a broader perspective. - (Your thoughts here!) Finally, some of us are looking at some initial prototyping. As the current design touches several entities in the ecosystem, it seems valuable to get some experience early, to help guide this work. To that end, we've started a table of initial trust anchor ID allocations in the repository. (As with all other work at this stage in this WG, this is all for initial prototyping, to be replaced with wherever things settle. Perhaps we'll decide to use a different ID allocation scheme, or something else entirely. But this seemed a coherent enough place to start gathering experience for the WG, and I'd rather have information like initial IDs somewhere broadly accessible.) David [1] https://github.com/tlswg/tls-trust-anchor-ids/pull/93 [2] https://github.com/tlswg/tls-trust-anchor-ids/pull/94 [3] I noticed the draft isn't marked as replacing draft-beck-tls-trust-anchor-ids in the datatracker. I think that's something only the chairs can fix? Chairs, do you all mind pushing that button? Thanks!
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
