+1 From: Kris Kwiatkowski <k...@amongbytes.com> Date: Tuesday, 17 December 2024 at 00:18 To: tls@ietf.org <tls@ietf.org> Subject: [TLS] Re: PQ Cipher Suite I-Ds: adopt or not?
I also think it would be good to adopt MLKEM drafts (hybrid and pure). No opinion on drafts for signature schemes. On 16/12/2024 23:13, Russ Housley wrote: +1. There are people that want to implement both hybrid and pure key exchange. This action would allow a path to RECOMMENDED = Y for both in the future. Russ On Dec 16, 2024, at 5:21 PM, Martin Thomson <m...@lowentropy.net><mailto:m...@lowentropy.net> wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2024, at 08:59, Sean Turner wrote: Is the WG consensus to run four separate adoption calls for the individual I-Ds in question? I would like to see adoption calls for the key exchange modes and not the signature modes. The key exchange documents are both more ready and more urgent. The question of whether to set Recommended = Y for any particular choice is separable and can wait. Keep things as Recommended = N for now. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org<mailto:tls@ietf.org> To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org<mailto:tls-le...@ietf.org>
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
