[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-require-tls13/ Thanks for pointer to this. It looks like a more detailed version of tls12-frozen draft. Is there a good reason not to merge the two documents? Is it due to different WGs? or different intended status? or something else?
It was originally one document, but the TLS WG thought that the application/deployment considerations were better handled in UTA, which agreed and adopted “their half.” :) Do we have an I-D which defines how long do we consider as long-term connections? or I-D which gives recommendations or best practices for how long do we consider TLS 1.3 to provide excellent security? We have this: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-limits/
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
