That would address your concern. John
From: Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Wednesday, 4 December 2024 at 15:21 To: John Mattsson <john.matts...@ericsson.com>, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com>, TLS List <tls@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [TLS] Re: Working Group Last Call for TLS 1.2 is in Feature Freeze >TLS 1.3 enjoys robust >security proofs and provides excellent security as-is. as-is, TLS 1.3 does not provide excellent security for long-term connections. It removes essential features such as asymmetric rekeying and reauthentication. Would changing it to “provides excellent security for many use-cases as-is” address your concern? Or “can provide excellent security”? Or does that open up the case where people say “where does not it apply?” Would it be better to just remove the “and provides” phrase altogether?
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
