*   I think Rich should retitle his document to "A 'permanent' Design Team 
for TLS", but then we can get on with it.

I think my draft served my intended purpose, and while I prefer design team 
over FATT, I don’t see a reason to push forward on my draft any more.  (And 
thanks for the nice words.)

I like the current plan. There are, of course, still issues to work out, but 
the architecture is now sound :)

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to