Did we really switch the order gratuitously on the wire between them? On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 12:02 AM CJ Tjhai <cjt=40post-quantum....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > The X25519MLKEM768 scheme defined in the document is a concatenation of > MLKEM768 and X25519, why is it not named MLKEM768X25519 instead? > > For SecP256r1MLKEM768, the naming makes sense since it's a concatenation of > P256 and MLKEM768. > > Apologies if this has already been asked before. > > Cheers, > CJ > > > > ________________________________ > PQ Solutions Limited (trading as ‘Post-Quantum’) is a private limited company > incorporated in England and Wales with registered number 06808505. > > This email is meant only for the intended recipient. If you have received > this email in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying > of this email is strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of the > error by return email and please delete this message from your system. Thank > you in advance for your cooperation. > > For more information about Post-Quantum, please visit www.post-quantum.com. > > In the course of our business relationship, we may collect, store and > transfer information about you. Please see our privacy notice at > www.post-quantum.com/privacy-policy/ to learn about how we use this > information. > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
-- Astra mortemque praestare gradatim _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
