Hi Peter,
back in 2020 I've implemented RFC 8449 for DTLS 1.2 in
Eclipse/Californium. My interest was out of the original scope,
I mainly use it to indirect indicate the preferred UDP message size.
In my opinion, the original scope didn't match the available UDP APIs,
see
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/NxSdyUk3Err0gJGOjnjCysuAT04/
br
Achim
Am 25.09.24 um 05:41 schrieb Peter Gutmann:
Martin Thomson <martin.thom...@gmail.com> writes:
Once negotiated, the record size limit applies to all records; it applies at
the record layer. Handshake messages can span multiple records.
Just out of interest, does anything actually use this? max_fragment_length
seemed to be universally ignored, and then record_size_limit was defined... in
case people noticed it this time round?
Peter.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
