On 9/4/24 18:03, Joseph Salowey wrote:
[Joe] As you say if all the reviewers are fine with being identified then they could be identified in the usual manner. That is not the situation we are in right now.
Perhaps fixing that would be a good next step then? I.e. maybe try see if a panel can be filled who'd be comfortable having their reviews made accountable? Seems like that'd be the easiest fix, if it's possible. And if it's really not, then perhaps the entire panel idea needs a more fundamental revisit. Cheers, S.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
