Yes, there are backwards-incompatible changes including domain-separating key material by parameter set.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024, 10:07 AM Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote: > ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd > > I think it would make sense to get new code points for hybrids based on > the final ML-KEM spec, so that implementers don’t need to use pre-standard > Kyber. > > > > Has anyone read closely to see if the kybrid/kyber draft would need to > change, other than the name? If not, then we can just change the name in > the registry by posting an updated draft. If there are changes, then we > need a new codepoint, also just by posting an updated draft. > > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
