We should do this.  It's good work and it completes the work we've already done 
here.  The status is correct.

I don't think that we need new security considerations about compiling this in 
or any of that.  What is in the draft is pretty good.

My only real suggestion is that perhaps -- for a server -- ECH_CONFIG might be 
included only once for each unique value that the server supports. This might 
be done with a special value for the ClientHello.random field (all zeros 
perhaps, or repeating the config ID 32 times).  That would save a lot of space 
in a server log.  Lookup would need to use the public name and config id, 
though I imagine that config id might be enough in many cases.

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024, at 09:15, IETF Secretariat wrote:
> The TLS WG has placed draft-rosomakho-tls-ech-keylogfile in state
> Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Sean Turner)
>
> The document is available at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rosomakho-tls-ech-keylogfile/
>
> Comment:
> At IETF 120 there was support in the room to adopt, but we need to verify
> that on list.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to