On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 6:10 PM Kyle Nekritz <knekritz= 40meta....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> On the surveillance risks, what differentiates trust negotiations from > other existing negotiation mechanisms? Any negotiation mechanism comes with > risks that it will be used to negotiate something problematic. It's not > clear to me why trust negotiation is significantly different in this regard > to named group negotiation, which also has a lot of relevance when talking > about mass surveillance risk. > > Do you see differences with trust negotiation, or in the specific > negotiation mechanisms that are being proposed? Or would you have similar > concerns if, say, we didn't already have named group negotiation, and were > discussing adding that right now? > I'm not sure what the new problem is. Can someone explain that? I didn't find the IoT explanation very convincing. Aren't these things all on IPv6 anyway? thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
