Isn’t the most obvious issue that more than one party have the private keys?
thanks, Rob On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 18:29 Devon O'Brien <asymmetric= 40google....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Hi all, We’ve added a document that attempts to summarize, and offer an > initial analysis of, several of the scenarios that have been raised in > on-list discussions related to the possibilities that Trust Expressions (or > more broadly, Trust Anchor Negotiation) could be used to enable > surveillance, or to make surveillance easier to achieve than with existing > solutions. > > We’ve been adding to this document for some time, and while there is > overlap with the documents that Dennis has recently shared, it is not a > response to them, as it was nearly complete by the time they were posted. > Our goal is for this analysis to be complete and accurate, so we will > incorporate additional scenarios, arguments, and analysis over time based > on the ensuing discussion. > > > https://github.com/davidben/tls-trust-expressions/blob/main/surveillance-and-trust-anchor-negotiation.md > > As with any of the other documents in the repository, we encourage you to > ask on list, or file a github issue if you feel we have missed something or > that our analysis is incorrect > > We look forward to the WGs comments and hope to see those coming to > Vancouver next week. > > - Devon, Bob, David > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
