Hi! At the last TLS WG session in Brisbane, I mentioned that we were waiting to process some RFC 8446 errata that might apply to the -rfc8446bis I-D. There is now a PR [0] for 5 of 19 errata that still apply to -rfc8446bis; the other 14 RFC 8446 errata we will close (the system uses the somewhat harsher term reject). Some of the proposed changes are editorial, but at least one change includes new 2119 language; see lines 4084-4088. EKR has also suggested some tweaks for this text, but it also includes 2119 language; see previous list discussion here [1]. As a result of the new 2119 language and that this change is post WGLC, we need to judge consensus to merge this PR. Please review the PR in its entirety and indicate whether you support merging this PR with the PR's proposed tweaks, with EKR’s proposed tweaks, or not (or propose something else) by 27 June 23:59 UTC.
Cheers, spt [0] Thanks to Ben Smyth for puling this together. [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/CoAEG9dGbKh4jUkfFtFfYjBkRSs/ _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
