Hiya,

A slightly meta comment:

On 21/05/2024 19:05, Nick Harper wrote:

From a process perspective, considering how a technology could be abused is
important and should be addressed to a reasonable level in the RFC. I don't
see a need for this to be fully fleshed out with every possible abuse
considered and discussed in an individual Internet-Draft.

Considering abuse-cases is something we've historically done
very badly, if at all, and is IMO something we really need to
do much better at. I think the history of the Internet over
the last decade or two provides ample evidence of that.

Cheers,
S.

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xE4D8E9F997A833DD.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to