Hi folks,

I haven't yet formed an opinion on this document yet, but I did want to
observe that calls for adoption are issued by the chairs, not by individual
participants. Of course, anyone can start a thread and comments in this
thread are information for the chairs, but if adoption does happen, it will
be via some separate process.

-Ekr


On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 11:42 AM Brendan McMillion <
brendanmcmill...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Devon
>
> I support adoption
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 7:38 PM Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov=
> 40microsoft....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> I support adoption.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: TLS <tls-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Watson Ladd
>> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2024 7:13 PM
>> To: Devon O'Brien <asymmetric=40google....@dmarc.ietf.org>
>> Cc: tls@ietf.org; Bob Beck <b...@google.com>
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [TLS] WG Adoption for TLS Trust Expressions
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 1:39 PM Devon O'Brien <asymmetric=
>> 40google....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > After sharing our first draft of TLS Trust Expressions and several
>> discussions across a couple  IETFs, we’d like to proceed with a call for
>> working group adoption of this draft. We are currently prototyping trust
>> expressions in BoringSSL & Chromium and will share more details when
>> implementation is complete.
>> >
>> >
>> > As we mentioned in our message to the mailing list from January, our
>> primary goal is to produce a mechanism for supporting multiple subscriber
>> certificates and efficiently negotiating which to serve on a given TLS
>> connection, even if that ends up requiring significant changes to the draft
>> in its current state.
>> >
>> >
>> > To that end, we’re interested in learning whether wg members support
>> adoption of this deployment model and the currently-described certificate
>> negotiation mechanism or if they oppose adoption (and why!).
>>
>> We absolutely need to solve the problem and the draft is a good starting
>> point.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > David, Devon, and Bob
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > TLS mailing list
>> > TLS@ietf.org
>> > https://www/.
>> > ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ftls&data=05%7C02%7CAndrei.Popov%40micr
>> > osoft.com%7C6ca75aa932344f322d9f08dc665fa375%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7
>> > cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638497808164901299%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjo
>> > iMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%
>> > 7C&sdata=2n8iljUXBtb4Jf%2FZTqN2Nl5j81WoatTYA64c5%2FRoH0A%3D&reserved=0
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Astra mortemque praestare gradatim
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list
>> TLS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list
>> TLS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to