Clarification: I agree on the need to rename the group space. However, I don't support using only mlkem as a curve for tls. However, mlkem as a hybrid makes sense.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024, 20:28 Loganaden Velvindron <logana...@gmail.com> wrote: > Agreed. > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024, 19:50 Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org> > wrote: > >> > we should really replace the “Elliptic curve groups” note in the 0-255, >> 512-65535 range row with something else. I am open to suggestions, but >> would like to propose “unallocated”. >> >> Short and to the point; +1 >> >> The only alternative I can see is constantly adding things, and >> eventually we get to "curves and lattices and heffalumps oh me..." >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list >> TLS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >> >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
