This is outside the scope of TLSWG, but there's not really a clean mapping
from client->server and server->client packets to requests and responses,
so I would suggest you introduce types that are clearer..
-Ekr
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 9:50 AM JustAnotherArchivist <
justanotherarchiv...@riseup.net> wrote:
> WARC records have 'types' ('WARC-Type' header field), and the two
> relevant ones here are 'request' and 'response'. The names come from
> HTTP of course, but we'd use them analogously for client-to-server and
> server-to-client TLS records, respectively.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
