Hiya,

On 13/12/2023 13:18, Bas Westerbaan wrote:
Not true. ECH, as-is, can be configured to use a PQ KEM. (Whether it's
deployable, and whether its performance is acceptable, is something we
should figure out.)

I guess we're just interpreting "as-is" differently. What I
meant by "as-is" was an implementation of the current draft.
I agree that we can figure out how to use a PQ KEM with ECH
but that's work still to be done, and hence wasn't included
in what I meant by "ECH as-is."

Cheers,
S.

PS: I do not want us to hold up producing the ECH RFC while
we figure that out - we should get the current thing out the
door first!

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xE4D8E9F997A833DD.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to