I am going to go ahead and forward this. Note that since the “Comments” column isn’t a thing until we get 8447bis through the door the note will follow.
spt > On Dec 6, 2023, at 14:46, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > > Okay a new proposal the ech_outer_extensions registration: > - Set "TLS 1.3" column to “CH” > - Include the following note in our new “Comments” column [0]: "Only appears > in inner CH." > > spt > > [0] PRs: > https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/pull/48 > https://github.com/tlswg/rfc8447bis/pull/49 > >> On Nov 29, 2023, at 16:09, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: >> >> >> Hiya, >> >> On 27/11/2023 14:35, Sean Turner wrote: >>> Bumping this up in case anybody missed it. >> >> 'case it helps, I'm fine with the original mail you sent and any of >> "n/a" or "CH" being used rather than "-". If it helps, I've a very >> minuscule hint of a preference for "CH" so you can count me as agreeing >> with MT. >> >> But I won't object to any other thing, 'cause I don't think there's a >> perfect answer, and it matters very little, and defining a new thing >> like "CHI" just for this seems OTT, but meh, I could even live with >> that too. >> >> I'd also be fine with this just left to chair/editor discretion FWIW. >> While it's good to bring things like that to the list, I don't >> think you need to delay based on a small-ish set of responses. >> >> Cheers, >> S. >> >> >> >>> spt >>>> On Nov 21, 2023, at 21:03, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi! I sent over the early allocation request and the IANA folks rightly >>>> pointed out two things that need to be added. This email is to make sure >>>> we have agreement on the two changes to the registrations in s11.1. If you >>>> don’t agree with the values proposed below please let the list know by 1 >>>> December 2023. >>>> >>>> 1. The encrypted_client_hello and ech_outer_extensions registrations need >>>> to indicate the value for the "DTLS-Only” column. Unless I am mistaken, >>>> “N” is the obvious value for both. See >>>> https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/584 >>>> >>>> 2. The "TLS 1.3” column for ech_outer_extensions registration needs to >>>> indicate a value; remember, this column indicates the messages in which >>>> the extension may appear. Currently, it’s “”. “N/A" has been suggested, >>>> which makes sense to me considering this extension never directly appears >>>> in CH, SH, EE, CT, CR, NST, or HRR extensions field. We can’t use “-“ >>>> because that means not used in TLS 1.3. “” is used elsewhere in the >>>> registry by only for unassigned and reserved values. The following PR >>>> change “” to “N/A”: https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/59 >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> spt >>> _______________________________________________ >>> TLS mailing list >>> TLS@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >> <OpenPGP_0xE4D8E9F997A833DD.asc> > _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
