> On Nov 17, 2023, at 11:58, Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote:
> 
>>> I assume you are concerned about the ContentType registry. I think it's 
>>> okay to add something here.
> 
>> Yes that’s the one. I mean we have 240+ spaces, but it is technically one of 
>> our more scarce spaces.
> 
> Yes but I still think it's fine.
> 
>>> I missed the detail about the RRC Message Type registry, and it would be 
>>> nice to have a portion of it set aside for private use and experimentation.
> 
>> Since the TLS WG is managing that one for a bit, we can the reservations in 
>> before we progress. What are you thinking like 2 values at the end?
> 
> Sure.

PR for this here:
https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/69

spt
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to