I support moving forward with this document.

On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 04:49, Andrei Popov
<Andrei.Popov=40microsoft....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Hi TLS,
>
>
>
> We would like to re-introduce 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-davidben-tls13-pkcs1/
>
> (it’s intended for the TLS WG and the Standards track, despite what the 
> document says at the top; we’ll fix it as soon as the submission tool 
> reopens).
>
>
>
> In the course of TLS 1.3 deployment, it became apparent that a lot of 
> hardware cryptographic devices used to protect TLS client certificate private 
> keys cannot produce RSA-PSS signatures compatible with TLS.
>
> This draft would allow RSA-PKCS signatures in the client CertificateVerify 
> messages (and not in any other contexts), as a way to unblock TLS 1.3 
> deployments.
>
> This is an unfortunate situation, and work is being done with hardware 
> vendors to reduce the likelihood of similar issues in the future, but 
> existing devices tend to stay around for years.
>
>
>
> Comments/suggestions are welcome,
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Andrei
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to