I support moving forward with this document. On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 04:49, Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov=40microsoft....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Hi TLS, > > > > We would like to re-introduce > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-davidben-tls13-pkcs1/ > > (it’s intended for the TLS WG and the Standards track, despite what the > document says at the top; we’ll fix it as soon as the submission tool > reopens). > > > > In the course of TLS 1.3 deployment, it became apparent that a lot of > hardware cryptographic devices used to protect TLS client certificate private > keys cannot produce RSA-PSS signatures compatible with TLS. > > This draft would allow RSA-PKCS signatures in the client CertificateVerify > messages (and not in any other contexts), as a way to unblock TLS 1.3 > deployments. > > This is an unfortunate situation, and work is being done with hardware > vendors to reduce the likelihood of similar issues in the future, but > existing devices tend to stay around for years. > > > > Comments/suggestions are welcome, > > > > Cheers, > > > > Andrei > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls