Hi Simon,
Can you expand more on the intended use case? When would it make sense
to use a RFC7924-like mechanism over TLS 1.3's session resumption?
I skimmed RFC 7924 and session resumption seems strictly better as it's
already widely deployed, allows for the DH handshake to be optionally
elided and has the exact same storage requirements (some space required
on the client, none required on the server).
Best,
Dennis
On 12/08/2023 06:58, Simon Mangel wrote:
tl;dr: We plan on updating RFC 7924 for TLS 1.3 and would like to check
whether there is interest in the TLS wg.
The TLS Cached Information extension [RFC7924] has not seen significant
adoption since its specification.
However, we still believe it to be an interesting candidate in upcoming
IoT application scenarios.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
