> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023, 11:31 AM Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek= > 40digicert....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > >> SCTs have always seemed surprisingly large to me, and it has always seemed >> like there should be a more compact representation that has the same >> security >> properties, but I've never found the time to look more closely at it. If >> someone >> does have the time, figuring out how to reduce the size of SCTs would be >> quite >> helpful. >> > > I've always said SQI-Sign for this. >
The 40ms verification time per SCT makes it a non-starter. Best, Bas
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
