We'd like time on the agenda to present and ask for adoption. This is the document I agreed to write at IETF 117 and am I pleased to say that Nimrom Aviram is a co-author.
On 6/19/23, 10:55 AM, "internet-dra...@ietf.org <mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>" <internet-dra...@ietf.org <mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>> wrote: A new version of I-D, draft-rsalz-tls-tls12-frozen-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Rich Salz and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-rsalz-tls-tls12-frozen Revision: 01 Title: TLS 1.2 is Frozen Document date: 2023-06-19 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 8 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-rsalz-tls-tls12-frozen-01.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rsalz-tls-tls12-frozen Html: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-rsalz-tls-tls12-frozen-01.html Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rsalz-tls-tls12-frozen Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-rsalz-tls-tls12-frozen-01 Abstract: TLS 1.2 is in widespread use and can be configured such that it provides good security properties. TLS 1.3 is also in widespread use and fixes some known deficiencies with TLS 1.2, such as removing error-prone cryptographic primitives and encrypting more of the traffic so that it is not readable by outsiders. Both versions have several extension points, so items like new cryptographic algorithms, new supported groups (formerly "named curves"), etc., can be added without defining a new protocol. This document specifies that TLS 1.2 is frozen: no new algorithms or extensions will be approved. Further, TLS 1.3 use is widespread, and new protocols should require and assume its existence. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
