On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 13:37 Christopher Wood <c...@heapingbits.net> wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. This slipped through the cracks. Given that we went > through this process with the text as-is, I think we can live without this > change. > Hi, There were a bunch of boring suggestions in my message*. I hope Ekr considers all of them. But, even if he disagrees on most, I made PRs for the ones that were obvious or there seemed to be some agreement that things could be improved: https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1316 https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1317 https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1318 On the subject of this consensus call, which I do not dispute, I made an effort: https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1319 Aside from those, I'm a little worried that not enough WG members have read the whole thing. That's just what I found, but that's only one reading. thanks, Rob * https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/_8G7LKEPGdNSIjdaBo5tpWSNwj0/
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
