On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 12:15 PM Dmitry Belyavsky <beld...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Martin, > > On Sat, 1 Apr 2023, 19:36 Martin Thomson, <m...@lowentropy.net> wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 1, 2023, at 20:28, Dmitry Belyavsky wrote: >> > Are the things like national-wide standards considered as new features >> > (until they don't pretend to be Internet-wide standards)? >> >> I would not expect the IETF to be specifying national standards (that's >> an obvious contradiction anyway). >> >> It is also unnecessary. The registration policies for TLS registries >> allow people to register extensions without IETF involvement (unless you >> consider IETF-appointed experts), so they should feel free to extend in any >> way that makes them happy. >> > > Right, but national standards often go through Independent stream > Yes they do -- though it seems like it would be easier all around if they just registered on the basis of I-Ds. In any case, they will be able to continue to do so under the proposed course of action. -Ekr _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
