True - but, unfortunately, quite a few readers misunderstand that and use depreciation as an excuse to remove support of deprecated algorithms and protocols. 

Wouldn’t be the first case an RFC gets misinterpreted. 

Regards,
Uri

On Dec 14, 2022, at 02:30, Rob Sayre <say...@gmail.com> wrote:


On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 8:14 PM Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL <u...@ll.mit.edu> wrote:\

 

I think I’ve made my point already – there are devices that use FFDHE, which remain secure (so far), and may require access by new <whatever>. Thus, an RFC that would prohibit it, sounds, as you said yourself, premature.


Deprecated does not mean prohibited.

thanks,
Rob

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to