Hiya,

On 24/08/2022 16:36, 涛叔 wrote:
I can't agree with you.

FWIW, I agree with ekr. I don't think the scheme
you outlined works, nor would it be a good basis
for changes to ECH. (Sorry;-)

As I said before, there may be some guidance we
can offer web server deployers in such cases but
I really can't see that involving "fake" names,
which come with all sorts of problems. (See the
recent dnsop discussion related to .alt for some
of the reasons why;-)

Cheers,
S.

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to