On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, at 22:39, Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) wrote: > Actually, that was our original intention with this draft - to specify > the framework, and to have other documents specify the actual pairs. > However, I believe that the sense of the working group is that they > want this draft to start with a limited number of options (and people, > please correct me if I'm wrong).
I'm saying that that is not a good idea. Drafts are cheap, and this one is done. If that is counter to the sentiment of the working group, then so be it. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
