Greetings Hannes,
This is for the record layer. And I really don't know how much would be
gained.
But as I would see it, this use of SCHC would be for UDP/DTLS/cipher.
Since it is starting with UDP, SCHC would have to be an IP Protocol (not
currently defined as such). So you loose 1 byte for the SCHC rule,
against the 8 probably saved in compressing UDP to 0 bytes. Then there
is the cipher. Try AES-GCM-12; what is currently used for the IV? Can
something like rfc8750 be added to use the seq # in the DTLS header and
gain maybe 16 bytes? I really don't know the DTLS header at all. I
have tried to find some decent layout as I am use to for ESP in 4303
(Fig 1) for side-by-side comparison.
But if it means being able to fit over some UHF carrier for unmanned
aircraft (UA) Network Remote ID (Net-RID) and Command and Control (C2)?
Worth the effort.
So this is not something I could do myself, but something that I see
using and thus pitching in on doing it.
On 5/30/22 05:33, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
Bob, is this about compressing the DTLS record layer or the DTLS
handshake protocol?
For the former, I wonder how much is there actually to compress (when
using DTLS 1.3)?
*From:* TLS <tls-boun...@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of * Eric Rescorla
*Sent:* Friday, May 27, 2022 5:30 PM
*To:* Robert Moskowitz <rgm-...@htt-consult.com>
*Cc:* <tls@ietf.org> <tls@ietf.org>
*Subject:* Re: [TLS] SCHC for DTLS
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 6:27 AM Robert Moskowitz
<rgm-...@htt-consult.com> wrote:
Is there any activity to define SCHC rules for DTLS?
Not to my knowledge.
-Ekr
I want this for Unmanned Aircraft (UA) Network Remote ID (Net-RID)
communications from the UA to the Net-RID Service Provider (SP).
See
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moskowitz-drip-secure-nrid-c2/
I am compressing ESP traffic using rfc 8750 and:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-ipsecme-diet-esp/
SCHC is negotiated in IKE (and will be in HIP) and SA tables allow
the
ESP receiver to recognize a SCHC compressed ESP Header and act
properly.
It is not so simple with DTLS. First UDP is below DTLS, so how do
you
compress it? The way I see it, SCHC would need to be assigned an IP
Protocol type so that the transport processing can start right up
with
the SCHC rule for UDP and then on to DTLS and then the cipher.
Or at least how I see the challenge.
So I am looking for any extant work on SCHC for DTLS and/or
interest in
this activity.
The CoAP SCHC work, rfc 8824, dodge DTLS compression. Or that is
how I
read it.
Thanks
Bob
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose
the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or
copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
