Hiya,
On 17/03/2022 20:57, Joseph Salowey wrote:
While we are all supportive of ECH, we are not sure that the PEM file format for ECH I-D (draft-farrell-tls-pemesni-02) is within scope of theTLS WG.
Hmm. Gotta say I don't agree as a commonly supported format like this (should this garner support) helps enable TlS server deployments switch between server implementations, but if that's the call...
The WG has not always but mostly recently stuck to adopting I-Ds that relate to the TLS wire format. SECDISPATCH or UTA or even DNSOP might be a better place for this work.
Can't see dnsop being relevant tbh. I'm fine though with it being formalised however works. Maybe this one's better just sent to the ISE? (I'll do that during/after the meeting next week unless there's feedback that something else is better.) Cheers, S.
Joe and Sean _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
