On Wed, Feb 16, 2022, at 22:26, Ilari Liusvaara wrote: > I think the language in tlsflags about acknowledging extensions is > confusing. Tlsflags behavior should be similar to extensions, which do > not have acknowledgment requirement in base TLS (any acknowledgement > requirement is per extension). So I think any acknowledgement > requirement should be explicitly stated normatively.
I agree with Ilari here. We shouldn't need to acknowledge this extension. And, as far as I can tell, the flags draft doesn't require it (though I admit that the text there on binary AND is confusing). _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
