Hi, I agree that the "Recommended" column in the IANA registry (which is frequently misunderstood) should just be renamed to "IETF Consensus". Obvious and self-explanatory.
Cheers, - Ira On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 10:45 AM Hannes Tschofenig < hannes.tschofe...@arm.com> wrote: > Rich, this makes more sense. Maybe the column should say "IETF Consensus" > (Y/N) instead of Recommended. > > In any case, the draft should say what recommended means for the flags > values. > > -----Original Message----- > From: TLS <tls-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Salz, Rich > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 3:19 PM > To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusva...@welho.com>; IETF TLS <tls@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS Flags and IANA registration policy > > The Recommended column is "was this done via IETF consensus." Some of the > values you think are odd are from pre-1.3, done by consensus, even if the > protocol is now outdated by 1.3 > > If there are some 1.0 and 1.1 extensions that are not defined in 1.2, then > that deprecation draft should suggest IANA changes. > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the > contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the > information in any medium. Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
