Glad to help From: Thomas Fossati <tho.i...@gmail.com> Date: Monday, October 25, 2021 at 9:41 AM To: Rich Salz <rs...@akamai.com> Cc: Achim Kraus <achimkr...@gmx.net>, Hanno Böck <ha...@hboeck.de>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [TLS] DTLS RRC and heartbeat
Rich, Hanno, Mohit, Thanks a lot for your excellent input. We are going to follow your advice and avoid overloading heartbeat then. Scope-wise, RRC will focus on path validation and liveliness use cases, leaving PMTU discovery out, at least for the moment. cheers, On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 4:45 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: > And we are not sure, if considering mainly implementation issues, will justify to allocate a new code-point. As one of the three TLS registry experts, let me tell you not to be worried about requesting a new codepoint. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org<mailto:TLS@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls__;!!GjvTz_vk!Eeto3IhgNvAs-fuQuW3f8r9ToWWyxEm_a6VHztwS_H52jjnmkZInzPkc1loF$> -- Thomas
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
