Sorry to be difficult, but as I said, I'd prefer to focus not on the question of the header of this document but rather on what we wish 8446 said. To that end, what text do you think should go in 8446-bis?
-Ekr On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 6:29 PM Sam Whited <s...@samwhited.com> wrote: > Even if linking this in updates implied confidence (though I don't think > it does), TLS alread implies confidence in its own EKM mechanism. I > don't believe this document expands on that. For example, it does not > detail any particular use of channel binding. > > —Sam > > > On Sat, Oct 2, 2021, at 13:12, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > I want to be clear that I don't think this is about credit. My concern > > is purely about accurately reflecting the level of confidence one > > should have in this mechanism. >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
