Daniel, This I-D is an update to RFC 5246 (see header). Only the 7525 updates were moved to 7525bis. While checking this out I did note a couple of there places in the I-D that 7525 needs to be scrubbed. I asked for changes in the following PR to account for those: https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate/pull/18
Thanks again for your reviews, spt > On Sep 3, 2021, at 08:00, Daniel Migault <mglt.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Looks good to me however this still represents in my opinion an update to > 5246 -- which I think is also what we want. > > Yours, > Daniel > > On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 10:37 PM Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > Just a reminder that sometime tomorrow I will ask for these PRs to be merged > and a new version of the I-D be produced so that we can make progress. > > spt > > > On Aug 27, 2021, at 10:58, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > > > > Hi! While address the IoT Directorate comments from IETF LC, some addition > > comments have been received. I would like to address these new comments and > > get the I-D in the hands of the iESG. There were three set of comments: > > > > 1) Based on Daniels and David Benjamin’s reviews, the I-D is not as clear > > as it could be. The end result of deprecating MD5 and SHA1 is that > > signature_algorithms is always included; we should just say that. Chris has > > submitted the following PR to address this: > > https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate/pull/19 > > You will notice that the PR removes section 6 of the I-D; it is unclear how > > much utility there is in updating the NOTE. > > > > We are looking to merge this PR at the end of next week so please submit > > any comments before then. > > > > 2) Hannes suggested that we remove the 7525 updates text now that 7525bis > > is underway. I submitted this issue to capture the issue: > > https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate/issues/17 > > Peter Saint-Andre (one of the 7525bis authors) has filled the following > > issue to incorporate the text from our I-D: > > https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/issues/245 > > Yaron has already merged the PR: > > https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/pull/248 > > Chris has also kindly submitted this PR to remove the 7525bis-related text > > from “our" I-D: > > https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate/pull/18 > > > > Again, we are looking to merge this PR at the end of next week so please > > submit any comments before then. > > > > 3) Hannes also had some editorial suggestions, that I created issues for: > > https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate/issues/16 > > https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate/issues/15 > > https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate/issues/14 > > These are addressed in this PR: > > https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate/pull/20 > > > > These ought to all be non-controversial, so we will merge them sometime > > next week. > > > > Cheers, > > spt (as Shepherd) > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > > > -- > Daniel Migault > Ericsson _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
