Hi!

It appears the we have consensus to adopt this I-D as a WG item.

I will work with the authors to establish the GH repo and get the I-D submitted 
as a WG item.

spt (for the chairs)

> On May 3, 2021, at 11:44, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> We would like to re-run the WG adoption call for "Return Routability Check 
> for DTLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.3”. Please state whether you support adoption of this 
> draft as a WG item by posting a message to the TLS list by 2359 UTC 24 May 
> 2021.  Please include any additional information that is helpful in 
> understanding your position.
> 
> NOTES:
> 
> 1) We are re-running this WG adoption now that DTLS 1.3 [1] and Connection 
> Identifiers for DTLS 1.2 [2] is done.
> 2) Here is a link to the original WG adoption call [3].
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris, Joe, and Sean
> 
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-dtls13/
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id/
> [3] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/IJYqpTmSHsCkiMaUPt_AltvKbe8/

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to