Look at RFC 701, it says: the precise set of octet values that identifies the 
protocol. This could be the UTF-8 encoding of the protocol name.

So I changed my mind and think it's okay to leave as-is but wouldn't mind if it 
became less general or more specific. For example, what if a protocol string 
matches a truncated UTF8 string?  It makes me think of SNI which could have any 
format, but really is "any format as long as it's a DNS name"


_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to