On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:42 PM John Scudder <jgs= 40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2021, at 5:32 PM, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > > This seems like a pretty basic assumption. These aren't just notational > conventions > or pseudo-code. They're the protocol description language that TLS is > defined in. > If one isn't familiar with how to read this syntax, then you really don't > have much of > a hope of correctly implementing this specification. > > > Be that as it may, the point about courtesy to the naïve reader stands. > The ECH (nee ESNI) spec says "All TLS notation comes from [RFC8446], Section 3." Something like that should work fine here, in "Conventions and Terminology". It is true that most TLS projects have generic code for dealing with this syntax. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
