Yup, we she it add this. Just so you know, the buck stops with me here :)
I've been meaning to build an ECH status page but haven't gotten around to
it.

On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:12 PM Rob Sayre <say...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:09 PM Christopher Patton <cpatton=
> 40cloudflare....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> (In case it helps someone else...) Is there any way that the
>>> HTTP response content could differ if ECH succeeded or not?
>>> I'm seeing the same 302 response in either case I think but
>>> maybe there's some specific pathname or something that'd
>>> result in different HTTP responses?
>>>
>>
>> That's right, we're just redirecting most HTTP requests to the spec right
>> now.
>>
>
> FWIW, I found this confusing as well. I'd expect a 200 "It worked!"
> response if ECH interoperated.
>
> thanks,
> Rob
>
>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to