On the heels of this change, here's another PR that I'd folks to weigh in on:

   https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/381

Thanks,
Chris

On Mon, Feb 8, 2021, at 2:29 PM, Christopher Wood wrote:
> We previously had a server-selected label for the ECHConfig, but that 
> has since been replaced with a client-computed identifier. There are a 
> couple of problems with this change in practice (see [1]), so the 
> following PR proposes reverting back to the old behavior: 
> 
>    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/376
> 
> There is a separate issue [2] regarding the length of this identifier, 
> but we can address that separately.
> 
> Please have a look at the PR and provide feedback. We'd like to merge 
> this soon. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris
> 
> [1] https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/375
> [2] https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/379
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to