On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:13 AM Jack Visoky <jmvis...@ra.rockwell.com> wrote:
> Hi John, Eric, > > > > Thanks for the input. We will certainly make some changes to the draft > regarding the inspection case. However, I can’t support removing the > performance/latency information completely, as I have heard from those who > have this very concern. That said, we will edit the language to make it > clear that this is not true in all cases. > Well, the draft just claims that there are latency concerns, but doesn't present details. If you want to make this case, it would be helpful to present performance numbers that show that these ciphersuites are substantially faster than the alternative algorithms (in particular ChaCha20/Poly1305) which is quite fast on many low end platforms. -Ekr
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
